{"id":1944,"date":"2023-08-08T18:12:06","date_gmt":"2023-08-08T18:12:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rightofway.law\/?p=1944"},"modified":"2023-08-24T16:36:06","modified_gmt":"2023-08-24T16:36:06","slug":"right-of-way-reads-eminent-domain-and-ufos-ais-still-busily-hallucinating-and-word-salad","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rightofway.law\/right-of-way-reads-eminent-domain-and-ufos-ais-still-busily-hallucinating-and-word-salad\/","title":{"rendered":"Right of Way Reads: Eminent Domain and UFO’s, AI’s Still Busily Hallucinating, and Word Salad"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

In a new article type for our blog – which we’re calling “Right of Way Reads” – we’ll be offering a potpourri, a word salad if you will, of short form topics in the same article, things that might otherwise not need an entire article and be more suitable for a certain short form blog site. However, since we don’t feel like posting them on said site given the “eminent domaining” of Twitter into X, we’ll put them here. Yes, we know a corporate rebranding is not eminent domain, but somehow there seem to be people who think that particular corporate rebranding somehow involves eminent domain, further evidencing the online slide of “eminent domain” from a term of art into a generic term for some sort of unpleasantness with feelings, however unwarranted, of theft. Regardless, on to the following bullet points:<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n