About Matt Hull

Matt Hull is a Pender & Coward attorney focusing his practice on eminent domain/right of way, local government and waterfront law matters. Earlier in his career, Matt worked in the Office of the Attorney General of Virginia where he represented the Virginia Marine Resources Commission on matters affecting waterfront property owners and other users of the state’s marine resources.

July 2021

Virginia Eminent Domain Legislative Update

By |2021-07-28T12:42:42+00:00July 28th, 2021|Acquisitions, Virginia Law|

Each July, in addition to heat and fireworks, Virginians get to enjoy a slate of new laws going into effect from the past year’s General Assembly session.  This year, two bills in the eminent domain realm merit mention. The first, Senate Bill 1260, simplifies the process for condemning authorities making use of the quick take [...]

June 2021

Supreme Court to Decide Case that Could Give States Ability to Block Natural Gas Pipelines

By |2021-06-07T02:39:08+00:00June 7th, 2021|FERC, Gas, New Jersey, Pipeline, SCOTUS, Uncategorized|

The Supreme Court of the U.S. is expected to rule soon in a case that could have a profound impact on the development of natural gas pipelines.  The case, PennEast Pipeline Co., LLC v. New Jersey, involves a natural gas pipeline project in the northeast.  PennEast obtained a certificate of public convenience and necessity from [...]

March 2021

February 2021

COAL COMPANIES IN PENNSYLVANIA FAIL TO MAKE OUT INVERSE CONDEMNATION CLAIM

By |2021-02-03T20:03:24+00:00February 3rd, 2021|Inverse Condemnation, Pennsylvania|

Coal extraction remains an important industry in the Appalachian region, so claims related to coal and other mineral rights make frequent appearances in the eminent domain caselaw of states in the area. A recent example is a Pennsylvania Supreme Court case involving an inverse condemnation claim asserted by two coal companies against the Pennsylvania Department [...]

January 2021

SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA DENIES LANDOWNER’S ATTEMPT TO CLAIM DAMAGES BASED ON SPECULATIVE PAD SITE

By |2021-01-04T22:39:03+00:00January 4th, 2021|Acquisitions, Virginia Law|

Owners of undeveloped land in condemnation cases sometimes try to increase their award by arguing that the project has damaged their land by limiting its development potential. As part of that argument, they often try to introduce into evidence proposed site plans or other drawings showing how the property could have been developed before the [...]

November 2020

Western District of Virginia Excludes Appraiser’s Report Regarding Damages to the Reminder

By |2020-12-28T18:43:10+00:00November 28th, 2020|Pipeline|

In the continuing litigation over the construction of the Mountain Valley Pipeline in Western Virginia, a federal trial court excluded a landowner’s supplement to its expert’s opinion on the ground that it contained new opinions that were not disclosed by the deadline for such reports set forth in the scheduling order. The appraiser, Dennis [...]

July 2020

Colorado Court Holds that Restrictive Covenants Not Compensable Property Interests in Eminent Domain

By |2020-07-13T17:44:22+00:00July 13th, 2020|Colorado|

The Supreme Court of Colorado recently reaffirmed that, under Colorado law, restrictive covenants are not compensable property interests in eminent domain cases. The case arose when the town of Monument purchased property in a residential subdivision to construct a municipal water tower. Because the lot was subject to the subdivision’s restrictive covenants, which forbade the [...]

May 2020

Virginia Supreme Court Gives City Victory in Lost Access Case

By |2020-05-28T21:30:50+00:00May 28th, 2020|Access, Inverse Condemnation|

The Virginia Supreme Court issued its opinion in Hooked Group, LLC v. City of Chesapeake today, ultimately affirming the trial court’s dismissal of the landowner’s case. The facts of the case and contentions of the parties have been described previously on this blog here and here. In short, the landowner, Hooked Group, LLC, owned a [...]

N.C. Supreme Court Upholds Inverse Condemnation for Recordation of Roadway Corridor Map

By |2020-05-22T13:30:35+00:00May 22nd, 2020|Inverse Condemnation, North Carolina|

The North Carolina Supreme Court recently upheld a trial court decision in an inverse condemnation case where recordation of a highway corridor map was determined to be worth almost the entire value of the subject property. Under North Carolina’s Roadway Corridor Official Map Act (the “Map Act”), the NCDOT could record a map in [...]

Go to Top