April 2024

“Devillier v. Texas” or Why People in Right of Way Should Care Even if They Don’t Care About the Procedural Nuance

By |2024-04-23T14:59:10+00:00April 23rd, 2024|Eminent Domain, Inverse Condemnation, SCOTUS, Texas Law|

Devillier v. Texas is largely about a procedural nuance, but the pictures contain a message for people in right of way that matters even if the procedural nuance involved doesn't change much day to day. The eponymous Mr. DeVillier along with more than a hundred other parties to this U.S. Supreme Court Case own property [...]

March 2024

A Plateful About Louisiana Oyster Leases: CFC Dismisses Alleged Takings Case

By |2024-03-05T03:44:50+00:00March 5th, 2024|Inverse Condemnation, Louisiana, Oysters|

We just came back from a meeting of the International Governing Council of the International Right of Way Association in New Orleans, so it seems appropriate to post about a recent case out of New Orleans, involving everyone’s favorite delicious New Orleans bite to eat, oysters.  The United States Court of Federal Claims recently handed [...]

October 2022

Hunting Dogs Remain Free to Roam

By |2022-10-28T21:54:46+00:00October 28th, 2022|Access, Inverse Condemnation, Virginia Law|

In a previous blog post, we explained that landowners in Virginia were threatening to challenge a state statute that they say permits landowners to enter private property to retrieve hunting dogs as a taking of their property under the rationale announced in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, 141 S. Ct. 844 (2020).  We also warned [...]

September 2022

March 2022

Update on Virginia Eminent Domain Legislation

By |2022-03-21T12:57:50+00:00March 21st, 2022|Access, Eminent Domain, Governments, Inverse Condemnation, Virginia Law|

The Virginia General Assembly has now adjourned its regular session, and both bills that were previously described on this blog have survived, though in modified form.  The changes to Senate Bill 666, previously discussed here, and Senate Bill 694, previously discussed here, will be discussed in more detail below. Senate Bill 666 The primary modification [...]

August 2021

Texas Court Rules Against Landowners in Dispute Over Lake Management

By |2021-08-04T12:46:12+00:00August 4th, 2021|Governments, Inverse Condemnation, Riparian Rights, Texas Law|

Williams v. Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS 5376 *1 (2021) reviewed whether a Texas trial court had proper subject matter jurisdiction to hear, inter alia, a takings claim under Texas law. Specifically, the court reviewed “whether [the Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority’s (“GBRA”) decisions regarding operations of [] hydro dams resulted in particularized injuries to [...]

March 2021

Inverse Condemnation of Oysters, Oyster Leases and Oyster Beds. Say What???

By |2021-03-23T14:06:38+00:00March 23rd, 2021|Inverse Condemnation, Riparian Rights, Virginia Law|

When we launched a brand-new podcast in August of last year designed for people with an interest in the right-of-way industry, who would of thought it would have come this far this fast? The Pendulum Land Podcast is now in its second season and in the Top 100 on iTunes! We at RightofWay.law are particularly [...]

February 2021

COAL COMPANIES IN PENNSYLVANIA FAIL TO MAKE OUT INVERSE CONDEMNATION CLAIM

By |2021-02-03T20:03:24+00:00February 3rd, 2021|Inverse Condemnation, Pennsylvania|

Coal extraction remains an important industry in the Appalachian region, so claims related to coal and other mineral rights make frequent appearances in the eminent domain caselaw of states in the area. A recent example is a Pennsylvania Supreme Court case involving an inverse condemnation claim asserted by two coal companies against the Pennsylvania Department [...]

December 2020

May 2020

Virginia Supreme Court Gives City Victory in Lost Access Case

By |2020-05-28T21:30:50+00:00May 28th, 2020|Access, Inverse Condemnation|

The Virginia Supreme Court issued its opinion in Hooked Group, LLC v. City of Chesapeake today, ultimately affirming the trial court’s dismissal of the landowner’s case. The facts of the case and contentions of the parties have been described previously on this blog here and here. In short, the landowner, Hooked Group, LLC, owned a [...]

Go to Top